Side-by-side comparison
Cursor vs Amazon Q Developer
Complaint records and Risk Scores compared. Both are in the Vibe Coding & AI IDEs category.
✓ Amazon Q Developer has a lower documented Risk Score.
Amazon Q Developer's Risk Score of 18 is lower than Cursor's 50.
That said, always read the full complaint records before deciding.
Product A
Cursor
AI-native code editor built on VS Code with deep LLM integration
50
Caution
out of 100
3 documented warnings
Vibe Coding & AI IDEs
Vibe Coding & AI IDEs
Product B
Amazon Q Developer
AWS's AI coding assistant, formerly CodeWhisperer, deeply integrated with AWS services
18
Mixed Signals
out of 100
2 documented warnings
Vibe Coding & AI IDEs
Vibe Coding & AI IDEs
Complaint category breakdown
Higher numbers in each row indicate more documented complaints in that category. Bold = more complaints than the other product.
| Complaint type | Cursor | Amazon Q Developer |
|---|---|---|
| BBB Complaints | — | — |
| Lawsuits & Legal Action | — | — |
| Misleading Marketing | — | — |
| Customer Complaints | 1 | 2 |
| Churn & Retention | 1 | — |
| Billing Problems | 1 | — |
| Support Failures | — | — |
Severity breakdown
| Severity | Cursor | Amazon Q Developer |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | — | — |
| High | 2 | — |
| Medium | 1 | 2 |
| Low | — | — |