Side-by-side comparison
Lumar (DeepCrawl) vs Sitebulb
Complaint records and Risk Scores compared. Both are in the Technical SEO Auditing category.
✓ Sitebulb has a lower documented Risk Score.
Sitebulb's Risk Score of 7 is lower than Lumar (DeepCrawl)'s 20.
That said, always read the full complaint records before deciding.
Product A
Lumar (DeepCrawl)
Cloud-based technical SEO audit platform now rebranded as Lumar
20
Mixed Signals
out of 100
2 documented warnings
Technical SEO Auditing
Technical SEO Auditing
✓ Lower risk
Full Sitebulb record →
Product B
Sitebulb
Visual SEO crawler with a strong and growing reputation
7
Clean Record
out of 100
1 documented warning
Technical SEO Auditing
Technical SEO Auditing
Complaint category breakdown
Higher numbers in each row indicate more documented complaints in that category. Bold = more complaints than the other product.
| Complaint type | Lumar (DeepCrawl) | Sitebulb |
|---|---|---|
| BBB Complaints | — | — |
| Lawsuits & Legal Action | — | — |
| Misleading Marketing | 1 | — |
| Customer Complaints | — | 1 |
| Churn & Retention | — | — |
| Billing Problems | 1 | — |
| Support Failures | — | — |
Severity breakdown
| Severity | Lumar (DeepCrawl) | Sitebulb |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | — | — |
| High | — | — |
| Medium | 1 | — |
| Low | 1 | 1 |