Side-by-side comparison
Heroku vs PagerDuty
Complaint records and Risk Scores compared. Both are in the DevOps, Monitoring & Observability category.
✓ PagerDuty has a lower documented Risk Score.
PagerDuty's Risk Score of 42 is lower than Heroku's 48.
That said, always read the full complaint records before deciding.
Product A
Heroku
Salesforce-owned PaaS that killed its free tier and raised prices sharply
48
Caution
out of 100
3 documented warnings
DevOps, Monitoring & Observability
DevOps, Monitoring & Observability
✓ Lower risk
Full PagerDuty record →
Product B
PagerDuty
Incident management platform — essential infrastructure with an enterprise price
42
Caution
out of 100
3 documented warnings
DevOps, Monitoring & Observability
DevOps, Monitoring & Observability
Complaint category breakdown
Higher numbers in each row indicate more documented complaints in that category. Bold = more complaints than the other product.
| Complaint type | Heroku | PagerDuty |
|---|---|---|
| BBB Complaints | — | — |
| Lawsuits & Legal Action | — | — |
| Misleading Marketing | — | — |
| Customer Complaints | 1 | 1 |
| Churn & Retention | 1 | 1 |
| Billing Problems | 1 | 1 |
| Support Failures | — | — |
Severity breakdown
| Severity | Heroku | PagerDuty |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | — | — |
| High | 2 | 1 |
| Medium | 1 | 2 |
| Low | — | — |